The Hidden Costs of Paper-based Healthcare Records

Healthcare institutes continue to use paper for documentation and paper records. Here are the consequences they face in doing so.
A healthcare provider with a laptop and paper based healthcare records.

Table of Contents

Subscribe Now

Stay up to date with Redactor’s latest news:

Despite the promises of digital transformation, healthcare providers around the globe are still grappling with paper-based records. You know the ones—the hard-to-read, easily misplaced, time-consuming documents that have been part of healthcare for decades.

If you’re in charge of operations at your hospital or clinic, you might be asking yourself: “Why are we still doing this?” In an era where technology can automate nearly every process, why is patient information still trapped in paper?

The truth is, paper records are more than a nuisance—they’re holding your organization back. From operational inefficiencies and compliance risks to increased costs and delays in patient care, the consequences of sticking to paper are mounting.

Sure, paper feels familiar, but that comfort comes at a high price. How much longer can healthcare afford to rely on outdated, error-prone methods when digital solutions are readily available and proven to improve efficiency, security, and care?

Why Paper-Based Records Are Holding You Back

It’s clear that paper-based systems are familiar to healthcare institutions with aging systems. However, the pain that comes with maintaining these outdated records is more profound than most healthcare providers realize. It’s not just about the hassle of sifting through piles of files; it’s about the underlying inefficiencies, compliance risks, and ballooning costs that are eating away at your resources.

If you’re still using paper-based records, here’s what’s really happening in the background:

  • Your staff is burning time and energy: Doctors, nurses, and administrative teams spend hours on manual documentation and filing. These are precious hours that could be used to improve patient care.
  • You’re sitting on a ticking compliance time bomb: Regulations like HIPAA demand strict control over patient data. Paper records are vulnerable to loss, theft, and damage. The more files you have, the higher the risk of non-compliance and costly penalties.
  • You’re drowning in inefficiencies: The healthcare environment thrives on speed and accuracy. Paper-based records slow everything down, from admissions to follow-up care. This delays patient treatment, reduces overall satisfaction, and frustrates both staff and patients.
  • It’s costing you—a lot: Every piece of paper comes with a price. From storage to retrieval to copying and mailing, the financial burden of paper records is far more than you think.

Sound familiar? If you’re nodding along, you’re not alone.

The Dangers of Paper-Based Healthcare Records

The persistence of paper-based records in healthcare isn’t just about stubbornness—it’s often about underestimating the risks and overestimating the comfort of the familiar. But let’s break it down to what’s really stopping healthcare providers from ditching these systems.

Data Security Risks

Do you remember the last time a data breach made the news? What about a story of sensitive health information being accidentally left out in the open? With paper-based records, the risk is omnipresent.

Even the most vigilant hospital can’t guarantee that physical records won’t be stolen, lost, or damaged in a natural disaster. Fires, floods, and even something as simple as a misfiled record can result in the permanent loss of vital patient data. The worst part? There’s no undo button for lost paper records.

The healthcare industry is already a prime target for cyberattacks, and while electronic health records (EHRs) have their vulnerabilities, they can be encrypted, backed up, and protected with multiple layers of security. Paper, on the other hand? Not so much. Each paper file is a sitting duck, waiting for the next disaster.

Regulatory and Compliance Nightmares

Think your paper records are HIPAA compliant? Think again. Maintaining paper records makes compliance far more challenging. Every time a patient’s information is accessed, transferred, or stored, it must be tracked. In an EHR system, this can happen automatically. With paper? You’re relying on a human to log that information accurately every single time—and we all know how easily human error can creep in.

Now, think about audits. When regulators come knocking, can you guarantee that every paper record will be accounted for? Will every document be where it’s supposed to be? Or will your team scramble to gather records from various storage rooms, offsite facilities, or even staff desks? The time wasted is only part of the problem—the real issue arises when compliance standards aren’t met.

Operational Inefficiency

In healthcare, time is quite literally a matter of life and death. Every minute wasted searching for a patient’s chart is time that could be spent delivering care. Paper-based systems are clunky and slow, contributing to delays in treatment, miscommunication, and increased wait times. The modern healthcare environment demands speed, and paper-based systems simply can’t keep up.

Imagine a world where patient information is available at the click of a button, shared instantly between departments, and updated in real-time without the risk of duplicated or incomplete records. That’s the promise of EHRs—and that’s exactly what paper-based records cannot offer.

Financial Burden

You might think that keeping paper records is cheaper than investing in an EHR system. After all, paper and filing cabinets are inexpensive, right? Wrong. The true cost of paper-based records is staggering when you factor in everything from physical storage space to labor hours spent on filing, retrieving, and duplicating records.

According to a report by the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, the cost of managing paper records is estimated to be 8-10 times higher than managing electronic records. That’s money that could be redirected toward patient care, new technology, or hiring additional staff.

And don’t forget about the environmental cost. Healthcare organizations using paper records contribute to deforestation and increased carbon emissions. In a world increasingly focused on sustainability, that’s not a great look.

How to Transition to Digital Health Records

By now, you’re probably wondering: “If paper-based records are this bad, why haven’t we moved to electronic systems already?” The truth is that many healthcare providers know they need to make the transition but feel overwhelmed by the process. Here’s how you can make that transition smoother and less painful.

1. Start Small, Think Big

One of the biggest mistakes healthcare providers make is thinking they have to overhaul their entire system overnight. You don’t. The key to successful digital transformation is starting small—target specific areas where paper-based records are creating the biggest bottlenecks and digitize those first.

For example, start with your admissions process or outpatient departments. Once you’ve successfully transitioned these areas to electronic records, scale up and move on to other departments. By gradually phasing out paper records, you reduce the strain on your staff and minimize disruption to your workflow.

2. Invest in the Right EHR System

Choosing the right EHR system is critical. Look for a platform that is intuitive and easy for staff to use, but also robust enough to meet the specific needs of your healthcare organization. The system should have strong data security features, HIPAA compliance tools, and the ability to integrate with other systems you’re already using, like billing or scheduling software.1

This might require an upfront investment, but consider the long-term gains. Not only will you save on the cost of managing paper records, but you’ll also see improvements in workflow efficiency, patient care, and compliance.

3. Train Your Staff

Even the best EHR system won’t work if your staff doesn’t know how to use it. Make sure you invest in comprehensive training for all healthcare providers and administrative personnel.

Transitioning to electronic records is as much about change management as it is about technology. If your team feels comfortable using the new system, they’ll be far more likely to embrace it—and you’ll see the results in their performance.

4. Develop a Hybrid Approach (At First)

It’s important to acknowledge that some paper will likely persist in the early stages of your transition. That’s okay. In fact, many healthcare providers find that a hybrid approach—where both paper and digital records are used—helps ease the transition.

Over time, you’ll be able to reduce your reliance on paper entirely, but giving your staff the option to work with both systems initially can help bridge the gap between the old and the new.

The Future of Healthcare is Digital

The healthcare industry is at a crossroads. While paper-based records may have served the industry well in the past, they no longer meet the demands of modern healthcare. With risks ranging from compliance failures to operational inefficiencies, the need for a digital transformation has never been more urgent.

If you’re feeling the pain of maintaining paper-based records, now is the time to act. By transitioning to a digital system, you’ll not only improve your operational efficiency and compliance but also provide better patient care. Remember, the journey to digital transformation doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Start small, invest wisely, and empower your team to embrace the future of healthcare.

People Also Ask

  1. Why is healthcare still using paper records?
    Many healthcare providers hesitate to transition due to costs, perceived complexity, and the challenge of retraining staff.
  2. What are the compliance risks of paper records?
    Paper records are prone to loss, theft, and unauthorized access, making it difficult to comply with regulations like HIPAA.
  3. What are the costs associated with maintaining paper records?
    The costs include physical storage, manual labor for filing and retrieval, and the risk of lost or damaged documents, which can result in significant financial penalties.
  4. How can we make the transition to EHRs smoother?
    Start by digitizing specific departments or processes, invest in staff training, and consider a hybrid approach during the transition.
  5. What are the security benefits of EHR systems over paper records?
    EHRs offer encryption, access controls, and regular backups, which make it easier to protect sensitive patient data from breaches or loss.
  6. How long does it take to implement an EHR system?
    The timeline varies based on the size of the healthcare organization, but most implementations take between 6-12 months.
  7. What should I look for in an EHR system?
    Look for compliance features, integration capabilities, data security, and ease of use for staff.
  8. Can small healthcare providers afford EHR systems?
    Yes, many affordable EHR solutions are designed for smaller practices, offering scalable options as your organization grows.
  1. VIDIZMO Redactor does not offer EHR management capabilities. ↩︎

Posted by

Rafay is a Senior Product Marketing Strategist. He is driven to exploring the complexities and challenges faced by various industries regarding redaction.

Related Blog Post

An image of a federal agent safeguarding classified information.
Federal agencies have a responsibility to protect classified information. But doing so requires overcoming several hurdles.
An image of a person with a laptop reviewing a GIPA record request.
Fulfilling GIPA (Government Information Public Access) requests can be a difficult task for organizations. Here's how AI helps streamline the process.

Ensure compliance with the best redaction software