Home / Microsoft 365 redaction
Microsoft 365 and Teams Redaction
Teams generates recordings whether or not anyone intended to build an archive. Then a records request arrives, or a DSAR, and every one of those recordings is in scope.
What Is Actually in Scope
A Teams recording is three redaction problems wearing one file extension:
- Spoken content — names, case details, health information, account numbers said aloud
- On-screen text — whatever was shared. A spreadsheet, a case file, a patient record, a dashboard
- Faces — participants, and anyone who walked past a camera
A SharePoint library or an Exchange PST export adds a fourth: the documents and attachments themselves, which is where most of the identifiable data usually sits.
How This Works
Teams and Zoom recordings ingest automatically as they are produced. They transcribe and index on arrival, so a meeting becomes searchable material under retention rules rather than a file that expires in the meeting tool.
From there the redaction is the standard pipeline: transcript-driven for the spoken content, OCR for the on-screen text, object detection for faces, and document redaction for anything attached.
For SharePoint and Exchange the common pattern is API-driven — files are pulled, redacted and returned, with the output policy deciding whether the original survives.
Integration Status, Stated Plainly
Microsoft Teams
Shipped — recordings ingest as they are produced
Zoom
Shipped — cloud recordings ingest on a schedule
SharePoint, OneDrive, Exchange
Available through the connector and API set
The full integration catalog is maintained on vidizmo.ai/integrations, because most of these connectors are platform-level rather than specific to redaction.
FAQ
Microsoft 365 Redaction questions, answered
Can Teams recordings be redacted automatically?
Teams recordings ingest as they are made, then run through detection and redaction without an operator opening them.
What about SharePoint and Exchange?
SharePoint document libraries and Exchange archives are reachable as ingestion sources, which is what makes a records request against historical mail and documents tractable.
Is spoken content in a meeting recording covered?
Yes. Spoken identifiers are found by reading the transcript rather than listening, and on-screen text visible in a shared screen is read separately.
Are attachments handled as well as the message?
Yes. Email redaction covers threads, headers, signatures and attachments in one pass, and the underlying text is removed rather than masked over.
Does content have to leave Microsoft 365 to be processed?
It is ingested for processing, and where that cannot cross a boundary the whole stack runs inside your own network, down to air-gapped.
Point Us at a Recording
Ideally one with a screen share in it. That is where most tools quietly fail.